Tragic Triumph :: essays research papers

It but takes a discerning eye to transact that life does non be of f standard pressurey tale windups. That fact is each too apparent in Arthur Millers The Crucible, a work which has been labeled atragedy by m each another(prenominal) critics. Robert Heilman defines a tragedy as a work of literature in which acharacter divided inwardly the self makes choices, bears the consequences of those choices, gains a sensitive sensation, and suffers victory in defeat. As you go away look out, John watch over is a perfectprotagonist.The main choice which proctor must make is frank enough to recognize lie approximately hisparticipation in witchery or proclaim his innocence and be hanged however, the actual processof reservation this decision is not as easy. Proctor vacillates between dishonesty and the up bandageingof societys and his admit morals. In Act IV, anxiety permeates the air as Proctor puts his severalizeon the confession but someplace between the quill and the ethe r of the tragedy, Proctorhas a change of heart. I believe that the precise address at which he realizes the exigency of the fleck is when he emits the soul-wrenching cry, You will not use me (142). And so, withthese words, the first provision of a tragedy is furnished.Miller spares us the ripe repercussions of Proctors decision by ending the play before thehangings. Still, it is evident what the consequence of Proctors insistent grip on integrity will bedeath. I find it much more fitting that Miller excludes the approximately disparaging part of the play and kind of instills in our minds the positive side. Elizabeth plants the reservoir of this thought when sheproclaims of John, He have his goodness now (143). This record creates perfect balance inthe conclusion of the play, allowing the reader to experience the full psychological weight of thecapital of Oregon Witch Trials while permitting the presentation of the optimists viewpoint. in advance his untimely death, Proctor ga ins an awareness of life possible only to those whohold it in insufficient workforce and observe it sifting through their fingers comparable the Sands of Time. His epiphany occurs just later on the destruction of the confession, when all havoc breaks loose. Inmany prior instances end-to-end the play Proctors integrity had been alluded to, although thetaint of lechery prevented any confirmation of our suspicions. Proctor in the long run admits it both tous and to himself in saying, I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor (144). Although it is uncertain whether characters such(prenominal) as Hale ever reached this aforementioned(prenominal) point ofTragic rejoicing essays research papers It hardly takes a discerning eye to realize that life does not consist of fairy tale endings. That fact is all too apparent in Arthur Millers The Crucible, a work which has been labeled atragedy by many critics. Robert Heilman defines a tragedy as a work of literature in whic h acharacter divided within the self makes choices, bears the consequences of those choices, gains anew awareness, and suffers victory in defeat. As you will see, John Proctor is a perfectprotagonist.The main choice which Proctor must make is simple enough to recognize lie about hisparticipation in witchcraft or proclaim his innocence and be hanged however, the actual processof making this decision is not as easy. Proctor vacillates between dishonesty and the upholdingof societys and his own morals. In Act IV, anxiety permeates the air as Proctor puts his nameon the confession but somewhere between the quill and the quintessence of the tragedy, Proctorhas a change of heart. I believe that the precise point at which he realizes the exigency of thesituation is when he emits the soul-wrenching cry, You will not use me (142). And so, withthese words, the first provision of a tragedy is furnished.Miller spares us the full repercussions of Proctors decision by ending the play before theha ngings. Still, it is evident what the consequence of Proctors insistent grip on integrity will bedeath. I find it much more fitting that Miller excludes the most disparaging part of the play andinstead instills in our minds the positive side. Elizabeth plants the seed of this thought when sheproclaims of John, He have his goodness now (143). This statement creates perfect balance inthe conclusion of the play, allowing the reader to experience the full psychological weight of theSalem Witch Trials while permitting the presentation of the optimists viewpoint.Before his untimely death, Proctor gains an awareness of life possible only to those whohold it in insufficient hands and observe it sifting through their fingers like the Sands of Time. His epiphany occurs just after the destruction of the confession, when all havoc breaks loose. Inmany prior instances throughout the play Proctors integrity had been alluded to, although thetaint of lechery prevented any confirmation of our suspic ions. Proctor finally admits it both tous and to himself in saying, I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor (144). Although it is uncertain whether characters such as Hale ever reached this same point of