Article Critiques

Critique of The mark of a Heretic by David KlinghofferIn his bound , The Branding of a Heretic , David Klinghoffer questi matchlesss the plight of scientist Richard Sternberg , formerly of the Smithsonian s proceeds Museum of Natural History in Washington Sternberg was a mean research associate with two doctorate degrees in biota and was also the managing editor of the museum-sponsored journal . Upon exercising final potence to expel an hold that touted pro-Intelligent Design theories , Sternberg was accused of letting his ad hominem ghostlike beliefs cloud his view of science . Sternberg was able to congest up his reasons for publishing the obligate with evidence - the prehistoric air of some(prenominal) species of animals whose presence could not be explained by ontogeny . When the stimulate was published St ernberg lost his office , his place in the de subdivisionment , and the assess of his colleagues . In addition , other employees began to flummox that they , too , could be accused of being too phantasmal . Klinghoffer criticizes Sternberg s employer and his critics as hypocrites The Branding of a Heretic was published in the Wall pathway Opinion Journal and has equal spell for both religious individuals and scientists . Though the phrase is clearly meant to be an editorial Klinghoffer s first moment does not appear until the end of the article , and is limited to wizard paragraph . His thesis is clear , in time : the conceit of Intelligent Design needs to be argued scientifically , rather than branded a religious story that has no virtue . We cannot possibly know if it has merit until it is exploredIn reading Klinghoffer s article , I found myself wondering if he himself had a stoop toexploit . At the end of the article , it mentions his religious affiliation (he is Judaic . Is it realistic that he indire! ct requests to further the religion-as-science cause ? Reading the article carefully made it clear that Klinghoffer perplexed Sternberg s plight in an frank manner .

His criticism is first of the museum s second in sensible , Hans Sues . Sues started the ball rolling by denouncing the article to his colleague and consequently taking it a step further by designate out an e-mailKlinghoffer does his best to provide evidence to support his controversy that the museum is in the grips of an anti-religious scare He attempted to speak to Sternberg s supervisory program , but he did not return his phone calls . He confirms that the Office of Special Counsel , or OSC is examine Sternberg s ouster . The most convincing evidence is that the journal is disassociating itself with the article rather than making any attempt to defend its publicationHad Klinghoffer cute to present a biased assessment of the scientific fraternity , he could have made Sternberg s dilemma just one part of the article , and demonstrated other scientific communities that refused to extend to assurance to ideas regardless of origin . The point of the article , heretofore , was to discuss and prevail sympathy for one scientist who has been the victim of anti-religious falloutMy in-person opinion on The Branding of a Heretic is that Sternberg...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper