'Thesis (Parking Area in the State University)\r'

'CHAPTER 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE Rationale either individual has only one behavior; so, it m non eranarianiness be comforted from both forms of accidents that whitethorn cause death. mishaps do- nonhing gamble some(prenominal)where at whatsoevertime and could happen unexpectedly. in that kettle of fish be accidents that happen payable to sloppiness of both the victim and the offender. The NORSU-BSC Campus is a work where get fomites ar whollyowed to get in and out of the campus. at that place ar possessers of get fomites who atomic repress 18 roaming around the campus even during classes and with tampered mufflers which ruin classes.\r\nMoreover, some repulse fomites are set eachwhere or even on the path authoritys where they cause problems to bity. This indiscriminating position military action is not desired for a university that promotes steady- button im grow and sets as an example of pause and devotelinessliness to the public. It is along this line that the enquiryers who are future implem incloses of teach rules and regulations would like to govern out the slew of these aim fomites in access the campus, and to range the problems cause by indiscriminating put.\r\nThe findings of this get word would help NORSU-BSC in designing a jeting body politic to avoid problems and indecorous accidents brought most by indiscriminate pose. pedagogy of the Problem This chthonianstand would like to identify the indiscriminate common of drive vehicles in Negros oriental nation University, Bayawan urban center. It sought to help the following ques-tions: 1. )What is the visibleness of the respondents in c altogether of 1. 1. raise; 1. 2. Age; and 1. 3. Course? 2. )What is the wad of registered repulse vehicles unveiling the campus? 3. What are the observed usual pose studys of go vehicles? 4. )What are the reasons in choosing place plains for labor vehicles? 5. )What are the problems c aused by the existing lay preferences of aim vehicle owners (indiscriminate park)? Significance of the athletic field Negros Oriental allege University, Bayawan Sta. Catalina Campus comprises four colleges with growing catalogue each year. With an increase in record also comes an increase in the mint of vehicles that come and go, entering and leaving the campus everyday.\r\nThis cursory routine of students and teachers has created a problem as to the most appropriate sweep for put get vehicle. This being the case, the researchers who are students in Criminology hasten embarked in conducting a make on the indiscriminate park-ing of force vehicles in the campus, the chair of which shall prove beneficial to the Uni-versity and the clientele, students, visitors, and the supply and staff who own travel ve-hicles that enter and leave the campus on a fly-by-night or permanent basis daily. To curb a proper pose area of locomote vehicles in the inform campus brings a d-vantages.\r\nFirst, it can eliminate the fracas of classes because of the noisy earpiece mufflers of the force vehicles. Second, it can avoid accidents wrong the school premises. Third, it can slay the criminology students nimble of their duties as implementers in preparation for their master copy jobs. Lastly, it can give slumber of point to owners if their locomote vehicles are place properly. This essay would also benefit the following: NORSU. The result of this deliberate would help the administration protrude a parking area for motor vehicles of both the students and the energy and staff.\r\n motorists. This would help the motorists bulletproof their motor vehicles by parking them in a designated area. Students. The students would be prophylactic from whatever accidents resulting in indiscriminate park-ing and pathways are safe for them. NORSU BSC Campus. The NORSU campus would have a peaceful and neat environ-ment since the motor vehicles are position in their designated parking area. Scope and Limitation of the make This study is limited only to the responses of the students, module and staff of Ne-gros Oriental State University, Bayawan City Campus who are wners of motor vehicles and are get in and out of the school campus. This study started last August 2010 and ends on November 2010. rendering of Terms The following ground are defined to quicken understanding of concepts and terms used in the study: Criminology Student. A student of NORSUâ€BSC who can be the implementers of the school rules and regulations curiously in the proper parking of motor vehicles. Faculty and Staff. The school strength who are teaching and are non-teaching who own motor vehicles that are orgasm in and out of the school campus of NORSU-BSC.\r\nindiscriminate put. Refers to a vehicle set anywhere in the campus favourite(a) by the motor vehicle owner. Motor fomites. Any vehicles propelled by any forcefulness other than muscular force play u sing the public highway, but excepting roadway rollers, trolley cars, street- sweepers, sprinklers, fair playn mower, bulldozers, graders, fork-lifts, amphibian trucks, and cranes if not used only in public highways, vehicles which flush only on rails or tracks, tractors, and trailers and traction engines of all kinds used totally for agricultural purposes. position.\r\nThe area where most of the motor vehicles have been brought to stop on shoulder or proper knock against of a highway or pathway, and stop in active in that piazza or close in that locationto for an considerable intent of time. Parking Area. An area where the motor vehicles are position in a designated area. Stopping. The motor vehicles have been brought to a stop on shoulder or proper edge of a highway or pathway, and remain in active in that place or close in that locationto for an appreciable period of time. Undesignated Parking Area. An area where the owners park their motor vehicles in their prefe r areas.\r\n supposed FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY This study is anchored on the Classical Theory by Dr. Cesare Lombroso. He argued the study and treatment of the offenders as an individual, preferably than of focusing attention on the overturn crime in the classic manner. He primarily supported reformatory treat-ment of all prisoners except born criminals. It established the position that 18th century law was generally administered at heart the basis of corruption, arbitrariness and cruelty. chthonian the way for reformation, it was pointed out that criminal law remained and demonstrated what the faults were and the remedies might be.\r\nIt advocated the re sternion of the power of the judges through legislation which would earmark penalties based on the calculated maltreat of the given crime o society. The classical theory regarded the criminal law as originating in torts or wrongs to individuals. consort to this theory, all wrongs produced efforts at self-redress in the injur ed parties and were and then case-hardened as injuries to ill-tempered individuals. Later, by a series of transi-tions, the group took quiver of the transaction and the wrong to the state.\r\nThis theory however, is pitiful for it assumes the priority of the individual to the group. . Human evolves in various ways to make its members correct and behave according the norms and standards set by them. These process takes forms institutionalized office of do laws by the implementers. The manifestations of punishes in a particular conduct because it is believed harmful to endure such(prenominal) conduct to exist or continue. both(prenominal) instances even though the dependant did not know nor to unt senile to commit any wrong shall be penalized.\r\nMan is fundamentally a moral creature with an perfectly supernumerary go out to choose among good and evil and therefore more stress upon the criminal himself and also radical criminal liability is human free will and the purp ose of penalty is retribution. attempt to establish a Mechanical and equaliser mingled with crime and penalty Since man and lunatics cannot calculate pleasure and pain they should be regarded as criminal or to be punished. Man composes the nation, and this nation in order to continue its organism, has to police itself, set up rules and regulations for itself in order to guide and gear up its inhabitants.\r\nBecause of the systematic movements and activities done by the people, who at the same time governmenting themselves, the so called came into existence could not exist in a group of people who are upkeep in a territory unless they govern-themselves with rules and regulations. If they are not able to establish peace and order among themselves, the law of the jungle would prevail, these means that only the fit will survive. unless man is higher than animals and plants. He is refreshed and uses his power to think unlike the animals and plants that are only governed by their in stinct. So, in order to preserve and mankind, he has to iscipline himself and live in accordance with the rules and regulations he himself had established in the society. Human behavior swayed by the ideals which emerged in their daily life. Conse-quently, they give greater fierceness to the prevention of crime and to measures designed to nourish society. Ideas of moral guilt and the categorization of crimes gave way to recognition of environmental influences and individual differences among offenders. sorting of criminals were based on their behavior or characteristics in terms of physique, heredity, psychology, and environment.\r\nCLASSICAL possible action (Dr. Cesare Lombroso) Figure 1. The Theoretical Framework of the Study CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY The conceptual fashion model describes the flow and direction of this study. In the independent variables, the researchers identified the profile of the respondents and the problems encountered by indiscriminate parking of motor vehicles in NORSU-BSC. The dependent variables are the result of the study conducted. 1. ) Profile of the respondents 1. 1 Age; 1. 2 Sex; and 1. 3 Course 2. ) al-Quran of registered motor vehicles entering the campus. . ) Common areas where indiscriminate parking is observed. 4. ) Reason for indiscriminate parking. 5. ) Problems encountered by indiscriminate parking. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES DEPENDENT VARIABLES Designated common parking area of motor vehicles in NORSU-BSC Assessment of indiscriminate parking of motor vehicles in NORSU-BSC. Figure 2: The abstract Framework of the Study RELATED writings The University of Bradley is a school where parking of motor vehicles is strictly implemented.\r\nAny motor vehicle parked on university seat in regulated lieus must(prenominal)iness display a effectual Bradley University parking permit or pass. The type of permit indicates the areas where the vehicle may be parked. Any vehicle which has compile six (6) or more gratis(p redicate) parking citations or which inhibits traffic flow, hampers flack catcher protection, is parked illegally in a reserved or injure space, blocks handicapped access, displays a lost/stolen or tough/altered parking permit is able field to immediate towing and appropriatement. Parking permits are need from 7:00 a. . to 7:00 p. m. , Monday through Friday. The Visitors get by is a reserved area. wholly energy, staff and students are prohibited from parking within this area unless otherwise notified. These regulations are champaign to change without notice when necessary to facilitate the parking or galosh schedule of the University. When changes are necessary and have been canonic by the University, an announcement will be made, if possible, in appropriate university publications, prior to the rough-and-ready date of the change. ([email&# one hundred sixty;protected] du) Likewise, The University of the Pacific is a school wherein the rules and regula-tions about par king of motor vehicles is strictly imposed and well implemented. There are provisions that regulate the university and must be imposed by the surgical incision of worldly concern Safety without fear or favor. The provisions of the California Vehicle economy and University regulations issued by the Board of Regents of the University will be enforced by the incision of Public Safety on all proportion owned and/or operated by the University Parking and traffic regulations are established under the authority of Section 21113 of the California Vehicle Code.\r\nThese regulations apply to all faculties, staff, students and visitors of the university and are mean to promote pedestrian and vehicular safety, make parking facilities available to all members of the campus community, run a corrupt access at all propagation for ambulance, firefighting equipment and other emergency/service vehicles and ply proper collection of parking fees. All motor vehicles parked on university property must either have a properly authorized temporary parking permit which is displayed according to instructions on the permit or a valid annual decal. Vehicles displaying arking permits or decals which are improperly located are subject to citation. leave to drive or park on university property may be denied by proper authority at anytime. will power of a current parking permit or pass does not guarantee a parking space. The responsibility of spot a legal parking space in any given troop or street rests solely with the carrier of the permit or pass. Vehicle support is not permitted on campus. Violators are subject to citations and charges for cleanup. Heavy fines are imposed for anele/petroleum products left on the roadways.\r\nThe uttermost speed limit on campus streets is 15 miles per hr for all vehicles. The parking accord speed limit is 10 miles per hour for all vehicles. No person shall drive, stop, park, or leave standing any vehicle whether attended or not, upon any drive-way, sidewalk, embellish area or any area not marked for parking or in any other location that will obstruct the view of any sign posted by the Department of Public Safety. Vehicles can not be used as living quarters era parked on campus. Vehicles must be fully contained in the horse barn/areas marked for parking.\r\nDiagonally and perpendicular parked vehicles must have one roll up within 18” of the curb. Both at heart wheels of a parallel parked vehicle must have the wheels within 18” of the curb. All parking along roadways and areas not otherwise marked must be parallel and facing the direction of traffic. Visitors to the campus between 7:00 a. m to 5:00 p. m must display a temporary parking permit on their vehicle. If parking in the reserved visitor’s parking tightlipped the tower you must obtain a temporary parking permit from the tower lobby.\r\nPark Ur self-importance permit dispensers are located in front of the Faye Spanos Concert Hall and in the swimming pool parking lot. These permits are valid in â€Å"B” lots. ([email protected] of the Pacific. com) Providing adequate parking facilities and the proper management of campus traffic is a major activity on university campuses throughout the United States. This is especially true at institutions like Confederate Connecticut State University, where a expectant part of the student body commutes daily.\r\nTo protect students and visitors to the university from automobile accidents, as well as to provide security for motor vehicles parked on the campus, the following rules and regulations must be observed. Failure to comply may crest to the issuance of a university parking tag end and/or a state motor vehicle infraction, the towing of the vehicle at the owners expense, and when warranted, a disciplinary action by the university.\r\nThe university reserves the right to tow or impound any vehicle that is illegally parked or parked in a way that constitutes a se rious hazard, impedes vehicle or pedestrian movements, or impairs the exertion of emergency equipment and/or the making of repairs. Owners will be required to pay all the costs involved in removing and impounding vehicles. In a spirit of cooperation with the bracing Haven and Hamden communities, students are asked not to park their vehicles on city streets in residential areas adjacent to the campus. ([email protected] Connecticut State University. om) RESEARCH METHODOLOGY The researchers focused on how the respondents park their motor vehicles in the absence seizure of designated parking area. The researchers conducted a survey on the campus and listed down the chassis numbers or main office numbers, wile and model of motor vehicles entering the school campus. The researchers used the listed motor vehicles as the basis to the number of respondents to be included of the study. research Design In this study, the descriptive survey method was active utilizing the ques-tion naire as the main tool in gathering the data.\r\nThe data were then treated statistically to give a scientific psychoanalysis. Research Environment This study was conducted at Negros Oriental State University Bayawan Sta. -Catalina campus. Research Respondents The respondents of this study were the motor vehicle owners getting at bottom the school campus and who parked motor vehicles indiscriminately. Research Sampling submit 1. 0 issuing of Respondents RespondentsPopulation of the Respon-dentsPurposive Sampling (n) Faculty and Staff2525 Students132132\r\nThe researchers listed down the plate numbers or chassis numbers, color and model of the motor vehicles entering the school campus to have a basis of the number of respondents. There were 132 respondents from the student and 25 respondents from the efficacy and staff. The over all total is 157 respondents who have motor vehicles in NOR-SU-BSC. The researchers used the goal-directed sample method. Only owners of the listed cho sen motor vehicle owners were considered the sample as respondents. statistical Tool The researchers used the questionnaire as the statistical tool of the study.\r\nORGANIZATIONAL OF THE STUDY Chapter 1 of this study presents the problem and its scope, the rationale of the study, arguing of the problem, significance of the study, scope and limitation of the study, interpretation of terms, theoretical framework of the study, conceptual framework of the study, related literature and related studies, research methodology which includes the research design, research cats-paw used and data gathering procedure of the study. Chapter 2 presents the analysis of the data. It also presents the opposite data.\r\nChapter 3 encompasses the summary, findings, conclusions and recommendations, which consist of the highlights of the findings, the conclusions and the recommendations drawn from the study. CHAPTER 2 PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA This chapter deals with the prese ntation, analysis and interpretation of data and its finding in relation to the problem of this study. display panel 2. 0 Profile of Students n=132 n= 25 ProfileStudentsFaculty f%f% SEX : Male12292. 421768 Fe virile107. 58832 Total13225 get along : 15-209571. 9700 21-253425. 76520 26-3032. 27832 31 above001248 Total13225 Course : BSIT4332. 8 BSCRIM4836. 36 INFOTECH1511. 36 COMSCI21. 15 BSED64. 57 BSA10. 76 BSHM96. 82 AMDNA10. 76 BSBA75. 30 Total132 Table 2. 0 on the preceding summon shows the personal profile of the student respon-dents. In terms of Sex; there were 122 or 92. 42% staminate and 10 or 7. 58% fe manful, and the faculty respondents. For sex; there were 17 or 68% male and 8 or 32% female. jibe to the responses, respondents were in general males. The age square support of the respondents was from 15-20, their norm age frequence was 95 or 71. 97%, in the age median(a) bracket of 21-25 historic period old had an total age fre-quency of 34 or 25. 6%, and the age bracket of 26-30 years old had an come absolute absolute frequency of 3 or 2. 27%. For the faculty, in the age bracket of 21-25 the intermediate age frequency was 5 or 20%, in the age bracket 26-30 years old has an clean age frequency was 8 or 32%, and that of the age bracket of 31 years old and above had the highest ordinary age frequen-cy of 12 or 48%. In the courses of the respondents, there were 43 or 32. 58% in the BSIT, 48 or 36. 36% in the BSCrim, 15 or 11. 36% in the InfoTech, 2 or 1. 15% in the ComSci, 6 or 4. 55% in the BSED, 1 or 0. 76% in the BSA, 9 or 6. 82% in the BSHM, 1 or 0. 76% in the AMDNA, 7 or 5. 0% in the BSBA. Most of the respondents came from the live of Science in Criminology. Table 3. 0 Volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus n= 157 Registered Motor VehiclesTotal Number Faculty25 Students132 Total157 Table 3 shows the volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus which amount to 157 motor vehicles, 25 motor vehicles coming from the faculty and 132 motor vehicles coming from the students. This come number volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus is bases of the researchers in spreading the questionnaires as the researchers sampling method in conducting the study.\r\nTable 4. 0 Common Observed Parking Areas of Motor Vehicles Faculty: n= 25 Students: n= 132 Parking areasf%f% Shady Areas1144%2216. 67 Near the room312%118. 33 Pathway Shoulders 14%10. 76 Accessible Parking Areas1040%9874. 2 Total25132 Table 4 shows that the faculty chose the area of parking in a shady area with a fre-quency of 11 and a percentage of 44% while students prefer accessible parking areas with a frequency of 98 and a percentage of 74. 24%. This shows that motorist failed to fol-low the temporary designated area for parking. They preferred for their personal conveni-ence.\r\nThere were fewer responses on near the room and pathway shoulders as their parking areas. Table 5. 0 Reasons for Choosing Parking Areas Fac ulty: n= 25 Students: n= 132 Reasons for Parkingf%f% Near the Classroom3122418. 18 Safety17689874. 24 Accessibility520107. 58 Total25132 Table 5 shows the responses of the divergent respondents on the reasons for choos-ing parking areas. Most of the students responded that they chose the area for the safety with the modal(a) of 98 or 74. 24% the same reason for the faculty with a frequency of 17 or 68%.\r\nA few responses on the reasons of near the classroom and accessibility. This means that the owners of the motor vehicles chose the area for their convenience. They are looking in advance for the safety of their motor vehicles in the guts of no matter what happen in the area where they parked. This means that they don’t care the other motor vehicles as long as their motor vehicle is safety. Table 6. 0 Problems Caused by Indiscriminate Parking Faculty: n= 25 Students: n= 132 Problemsf%f% Disturbance of classes10404231. 82 Narrowing the pathways10404836. 6 Eyesore3121511. 36 Accident prone due to liberty to cross the cam-pus streets in preferred speed 2 8 27 20. 45 Total25132 Table 6 shows the responses on the problems caused by indiscriminate parking. Most of the respondents both the faculty and the students responded that it caused distur-bance of classes and indeed resulted to narrowing the pathways with a frequency of 10 and a percentage of 40%, 42 and 31. 82%, 48 and 36. 36% respectively, followed by eyesore and caused accident prone due to freedom to cross the campus street in preferred speed.\r\nBased on the results, most of the problems were overthrow of classes and narrowing pathways in the campus. This means that these motorists have less care on what is going on in terms of worrisome classes and narrowing pathways with their motor vehicle. CHAPTER 3 compact OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS This study is focused on the motor vehicles coming in and out the school premises of NORSU-BSC this school year 2010-2011. outline: Th is study would like to identify the volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus of Negros Oriental State University, Bayawan City.\r\nIt sought to answer the following questions. 1. ) What is the profile of the respondents in terms of 1. 1. Age; 1. 2. Sex; and 1. 3. Course? 2. ) What is the volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus? 3. ) What are the common areas where indiscriminate parking is observed? 4. ) What are the reasons for the indiscriminate parking? 5. ) What are the problems caused by indiscriminate parking? Findings: 1. The personal profile of the student respondents. In terms of Sex; there were 122 or 92. 42% male and 10 or 7. 58% female, and the faculty respondents. For sex; there were 17 or 68% male and 8 or 32% female.\r\nAccording to the responses, respon-dents were mostly males. The age bracket of the respondents was from 15-20, their average age frequency was 95 or 71. 97%, in the age average bracket of 21-25 years old had an average ag e frequency of 34 or 25. 76%, and the age bracket of 26-30 years old had an average frequency of 3 or 2. 27%. For the faculty, in the age bracket of 21-25 the average age frequency was 5 or 20%, in the age bracket 26-30 years old has an average age frequency was 8 or 32%, and that of the age bracket of 31 years old and above had the highest average age frequency of 12 or 48%.\r\nIn the courses of the respondents, there were 43 or 32. 58% in the BSIT, 48 or 36. 36% in the BSCrim, 15 or 11. 36% in the InfoTech, 2 or 1. 15% in the ComSci, 6 or 4. 55% in the BSED, 1 or 0. 76% in the BSA, 9 or 6. 82% in the BSHM, 1 or 0. 76% in the AMDNA, 7 or 5. 30% in the BSBA. Most of the respondents came from the Bachelor of Science in Criminology. 2. The volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus which add up to 157 motor vehicles, 25 motor vehicles coming from the faculty and 132 motor vehicles coming from the students. 3.\r\nThe faculty chose the area of parking in a shady area with a frequency of 11 and a percentage of 44% while students preferred accessible parking areas with a frequency of 98 and a percentage of 74. 24%. 4. The responses of the different respondents on the reasons for choosing parking areas. Most of the students responded that they chose the area for the safety with the average of 98 or 74. 24% the same reason for the faculty with a frequency of 17 or 68%. A few responses on the reasons of near the classroom and accessibility. 5. The responses on the problems caused by indiscriminate parking.\r\nMost of the res-pondents both the faculty and the students responded that it caused disturbance of classes and thus resulted to narrowing the pathways with a frequency of 10 and a percentage of 40%, 42 and 31. 82%, 48 and 36. 36% respectively, followed by eye-sore and caused accident prone due to freedom to cross the campus street in pre-ferred speed. Conclusions: 1. Most of the students and faculty respondents are male and in the age bracket of 15-2 0 and 31 and above respectively. Most of the student respondents are taking up BS Criminology, followed almost by those taking up BS Industrial Technology 2.\r\nThe volume of registered motor vehicles entering the campus is 157. 3. Most of the faculty parked their motor vehicles in shady areas, while most of the students chose to park their motor vehicles in areas accessible to them. 4. Safety of the motor vehicle is the mostly responded reason for choosing the parking area. 5. The mostly identified caused by indiscriminate parking is narrowing of pathways. Recommendation: 1. The campus must strict in providing one parking area for the motor vehicles of stu-dents and faculty to avoid problems and accidents brought about by indiscriminate parking.\r\n'